Peterson historically sought out and subsequently received endorsement from the Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL) – the largest pro-life organization in Minnesota. Unfortunately for Mr. Peterson, however, the organization recently withdrew support. The lost endorsement stems from his refusal to repeal the Affordable Care Act, more popularly known as “Obamacare.” This act contains provisions which will help fund abortions for pregnant women. Earlier in the year, Peterson claimed the Act was “not all bad.”
Upon departing from the on-campus event, Peterson offered commentary on the loss of his Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life (MCCL) endorsement. Peterson stated that the consistent right-to-life supporters “are a bunch of extremists.” The MCCL’s revoking their endorsement, he continued, marked “the end of them as an organization.” For reference, he mentioned his perceived wisdom in the bipartisan political pose the National Rifle Association makes certain to adopt, however artificial it may be. The NRA, he said, is “smart, because they always include 50-60 Democrats.”
Mr. Peterson eventually distances himself from the pro-life movement, saying, “the only place it got reported was MPR, and those people don’t listen to MPR.”
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time Collin Peterson has spoken negatively of his constituents. In fact, in 2009 he was filmed saying “Twenty-five percent of my people believe the Pentagon and Rumsfeld were responsible for taking the twin towers down… That’s why I don’t do town meetings.” And he hasn’t. Mr. Peterson repeatedly fails to respond to requests for Town Hall meetings. This leaves voters with unanswered questions, such as the one asked of him Tuesday.
Collin Peterson has been in office for longer than many college students have been alive. His “political career” has turned into just that – a career. Thus far, Mr. Peterson has only to maintain good public relations to maintain his position. Unfortunately, his public statements about the pro-life movement do not match up with his uncensored comments. When representatives say certain things to win the votes of those they hope to represent, but makes statements that contradict their supposed principles, it makes it difficult to believe their convictions.