Skip to content
The Concordian
Menu
  • News
    • Campus
    • Community
    • Nation
    • World
  • Variety
    • Class of 2020
    • Art
    • Film/TV
    • Food
    • Music
    • Theatre
    • Events
    • Sustainability
  • Sports
    • Fall
    • Winter
    • Spring
    • Professional
    • Features
  • Opinions
    • Columns
    • Editorials
    • Letters
  • Blogs
    • Politics
    • Reviews
  • Submissions
  • About
    • Staff
    • Advertising
    • Contact
    • Discussion Guidelines
  • Submit News
    • Press Releases/Articles
    • News Tips
    • Letter to the Editor
  • Staff
    • Desarae Kohrs
    • Noah Bloch
    • Ephriam Cooper
    • Sam Kalow
    • Ross Motter
    • Saige Mattson
    • Liz Komagum
    • Olivia Kelly
    • Trenten Cavaness
    • Megan Noggle
    • Morgan Holecek
    • Kayla Molstre
    • Alyssa Czernek
    • Jordon Perkins
    • Brennan Collins
Menu

Letter to the Editor: Who won?  

Posted on September 12, 2024November 3, 2024 by Ruel Domi

Despite the immense help Vice President Kamala Harris received from the Democratic Party moderators, the debate was effectively a tie.    

The first debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris highlighted a significant pro-Harris, pro-Democrat media bias. ABC News moderators, particularly Linsey Davis, acted in a partisan manner by frequently interrupting and fact-checking Trump while largely ignoring Harris’ inconsistencies and false claims. This media bias was particularly evident in how Harris was portrayed as a moderate despite her leftist record.  

She shifted stances on key issues like fracking and immigration, but the moderators ignored these policy flip-flops. Meanwhile, Trump exposed Harris’ left-wing policies, such as price caps and wealth taxes, while debunking false accusations like his support for a national abortion ban. Harris refused to put a limit on when abortion should be banned, a stance the media shielded from scrutiny. Immigration numbers and crime rates were downplayed, as were local reports of illegal immigrants engaging in unlawful activities. The moderators allowed misinformation to circulate, including lies about Trump’s stance on white supremacy and Project 2025. They also failed to mention an assassination attempt on Trump, focusing instead on demonizing him as an anti-Democratic force.  

Meanwhile, Harris’ inconsistency on key issues, from healthcare to foreign policy, went largely unchallenged. The debate revealed not just policy differences but also the extent to which the media shapes the narrative in favor of the Democrats. 

Have an opinion? Write about it. Email: mander76@cord.edu 

  • Ruel Domi
    Ruel Domi

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

  • Concordia Holds 16th annual Golden Cobbs Award Ceremony April 24, 2025
  • Laughing Through It All: A Research Conference on Suicide and Stand Up  April 24, 2025
  • Looking Back on a Legacy: Halvorson and Davies End Term with SGA  April 17, 2025
  •  A Look Inside the 2025 URSCA Symposium  April 17, 2025
  • Youth Incarceration and Depression: A Cycle of Neglect April 17, 2025
  • Getting ready for 2025 Cornstock: The 502s, Flashmob, and GG and the Groove  April 17, 2025

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2025 The Concordian | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme